I don't care what the N.C. Supremes say (4-3), doctors have no place in the equation of death. I have news for Sarah Ovaska (the N&O's mouthpiece on this one): If the state really wants to kill somebody, maybe they should resort to the older/messier ways (that don't "need" IV's). It might keep them honest. (Here's the 5/2 N&O update.)
Looks like the N.C. Medical Practice Act is still in dire need of some legislative tweaking . . . not just about this, but about whistle-blower protection as well (see the preceding post). And the N.C. Medical Board, always way-late to the party . . . or not there at all (what-the-hay, let's put them all up) when it comes to enforcing ethical principles, certainly has its work cut out for it.
5/2 Update: This post originally went up on 5/1. But I have moved it back to 4/28 because I really want "Part Three" in my series from the legal files to sit prominently on the "home page" and percolate.
I had intended to take a long break prior to resuming posting again (with letters from parents that the Randolph Hospital Board of Directors ignored and the Courier Tribune would not publish). But the N.C. Supreme Court trumped that plan.
It is clear from the Supreme Court's decision that Medical Ethics means NOTHING in this state.
Of course, I already knew that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment