Wednesday, March 19, 2008

An Answer For Sam Spagnola: "Mary, What Would You Have People Do On Your Behalf?"

In my last thread, Sam Spagnola and I have been engaged in a bit of a pissing contest. I'm quite certain it's been very entertaining for some of the locals. I've decided to "top-level" (Sue's term, not mine) a response to Sam's last question . . . which was,

"Again Mary, what would you have people do on your behalf?"

Honestly, sometimes I really want to cry. My head hurts from banging it against the wall. And the tips of my fingers are numb from pounding out the same answers over and over again.

Here's my response:

AGAIN Sam, that question has been asked and answered over and over and over again on my blog and in the various threads of the last few days.

Dennis Quaid and his wife were all over 60 Minutes and all of the morning talk shows yesterday talking about a "broken healthcare system" and the "White Wall" they encountered when their newborn twins almost died due to a medical error.

In stark contrast, I have been blogging on my own situation for three years (about what happened to me when I intervened to help a critically-ill newborn whose "care" can only be described as a series of medical errors) . . . begging & pleading for a tiniest fraction of the press attention Quaid has gotten simply because he is a big movie star.

As a doctor in public service - brought home with public money, I was
professionally pulverized (by a "non-profit" no less) for making a snap decision in the middle of the night - defying threats against my livelihood in order to do the right thing by a patient (not even my own).

It's what JR or Cone or Sue or Roch or YOU would have expected me to do had the baby involved been your child or grandchild.

I've blogged about arrogance and incompetence and threats and retaliation and cover-ups and wasted/monopolize resources and MORE (legal) retaliation and perjury and contempt and fraud.

For my trouble, I've been ridiculed, taunted, insulted, banned, de-linked, and mis-diagnosed (to this day, I cannot put into words how personally hurtful and professionally despicable I found/still find Sue Polinski's self-serving "malignant narcissism" stunt to be) . . . everything but treated like a living, breathing, deeply-hurt human being trying/fighting/clawing to get her life and destiny back (that is, until recently - my sincere/humble thanks are offered to MeB/Joe/Bubba/Billy).

Joe Guarino nailed it in the commentary on his thread. As a lowly, "no-name", "ordinary" employed physician in public service I was powerless.


But people simply do not care. When it comes to medicine, they want Walmart - everything instant and cheap or even free. Then they can't understand why bad things happen when our system is so focused on instant and cheap. Moreover, they think all doctors are rich and greedy and can roll with the punches.

And they are just wrong - especially about doctors in primary care.

What was done to me should never have happened . . . and even if it did, as a doctor in federal & state service programs, I should have been able to pick up a phone ten years ago, call a regulatory agency, blow my whistle without fear of retaliation, and PREVENT with one or two phone calls what ten years in our *&^%$#@!+ regulatory and legal systems have not been able to repair.

You yourself are sympathetic (at least I think you are) to the fact that after being screwed by the medical establishment (wagons circled - deaf, dumb and blind), I got a
bum ride in the NC legal system (shafted by lawyers with perhaps not as many scruples as you) . . . and have not been able to get anyone anywhere to lift a finger to address it - no matter what the law may say about perjury being a serious infraction - punishable by fines and jail time.

I've already outlined (my
post) what I'd like to Ed Cone to do (this applies to the N&R's John Robinson too). That would be to ADMIT that I exist (instead of ignore/ban/delink me) . . . ADMIT that I suffered horrific professional and personal insults (right under their high & mighty journalists' noses) for doing the right thing . . . ADMIT that (as healthcare scandal after scandal rolls out of Raleigh) that my story is indeed "relevant" to (and sheds much light on) WHY these scandals happen and WHY people within the system do not blow whistles . . . and ADMIT that the evidence is THERE that two "non-profit" executives in Asheboro lied over and over and over again to serve their own greedy purposes (and seal of their acts of destruction against me).

PUT MY CASE FRONT AND CENTER in the blogs and in the newspapers. BRING IT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC . . . the larger public that does not blog . . . the public that still (for reasons I cannot fathom) still trusts newspapers to be our watchdogs (as opposed to lapdogs) and report the facts and tell the truth.

Make no mistake. I want these two hospital administrators raked through the coals. I want them to suffer a small portion of the indignities & humiliation & hardship they inflicted upon me. I want them investigated & prosecuted, and their hospital sanctioned by the state - for the awful things they did to a young doctor just trying to her job.


It's not malice or revenge. It's righteous indignation because I was victimized by a CRIME.

And I damned sure want to make sure it does not happen to anyone else!

If perjury is an affront to the cornerstone of our legal system - if no one is truly about the law - then PROVE IT!

The ONLY way that is going to happen is by turning up the heat under the Randolph County DA (here's the story of the bad blood and conflicted interest that justifies my asking for a referral up the legal food chain) and/or NC Attorney General's seats (as happened in the Duke/Nifong case) . . . AND by lighting fires under the ivory towers of the Medical Board (and Medical Society) and the State Bar and NCDHHS and the NC Legislature - applying public pressure to do something/anything that would protect employed physicians and medical whistle-blowers from the kind retaliation I suffered.

If people within the system were not so deeply entrenched in
the status-quo of corruption - if they felt safe in reporting problems - I daresay millions might not have been wasted in our latest very costly healthcare fiasco (mental health) and at least a few innocents caught in the medical crossfire might not have died.

What do you think?

It's simple, Sam. I'm here because I want light and air. I want to see our local newspapers & journalists do what they are supposed to do . . . instead of wink and nod and play suck-up to the "powers-that-be".

And if they don't do provide the light and air, it's what blogs (as our "alternative media") should be doing. "Citizen journalism" and all that blather.

The
Courier Tribune is a lost cause. Corporate carpetbaggers, David and Bonnie Renfro might as well own my hometown - and Randolph Hospital CEO, Bob Morrison (my lying, cheating nemesis), is their best buddy. But if, as Editor of Asheboro's alternative daily newspaper, John Robinson would get his nose out of the Cone Healthcare System's butt (where it is clearly deeply buried) . . . and blogger-king Ed Cone would climb down off his morally-superior/nose-bent-out-of-shape high horse and use some of those family connections he likes to blog/reminisce about, what I'd like to see happen is NOT impossible at all.

You must be the change you want to see in the world.


I hear a whole lot of talk in the blogosphere about fixing healthcare. You don't do that by "looking forward" and skipping merrily along (literally over dead bodies) and ignoring the past - pretending it did not happen. You don't do that by wishing. You don't do it by spewing nothing but hot air and flowery rhetoric about "sunshine" and "community" and "open records" (which in my case were not open at all).

You don't do it by de-linking or banning or ignoring the people who are trying to tell you what is going on right under your nose. You don't do it by telling people who've been wronged and injured to just "get over it" and "move on".

If you're an "elite" GSO blogger, you STOP using Dr. Mary Johnson as your favorite (well, maybe second-favorite - I love my
Bubba!) punching bag because she does not worship at the altars of Clinton, Easley and Edwards (under whose watches she suffered countless injuries and insults*). You start networking and forwarding her blog/story to other bloggers - other media outlets - larger venues. You put a blogging microscope (or proctoscope - at this point you'd probably get further) on John Robinson and David Renfro and their real motives for squashing her story.

(*I've heard a rumor that you don't worship at these altars either, Sam).

And if you call yourself a journalist, you do that by taking a long hard look at the past (dare I use the word "investigate"?), rolling up your sleeves and
punching out the story. You MOVE THAT PEN/KEYBOARD to prompt ACTION that might spotlight and correct and rectify the mistakes (instead of waiting for more money to be wasted and more people to die).

I sincerely hope, Sam, that this adequately answers your question.

4 comments:

sspagnola said...

Not quite. I understand being upset over being delinked.

But suppose I write a post on your story. Then what? The next day I'm going to write about something else.

If Ed treats you like crap, you only empower him more when you stress how important it is that HE write about your story. Cone doesn't have that kind of power despite what he thinks.

But still you have the same issue. Suppose Cone does a big post on your story. The next day he is going to write about something else.

Nobody is going to convert their blog into nothing but a running narrative on your case. We all have things we like/want to write about. That's why most of us started our blogs.

I still think you are asking people to devote as much time to your case as you are, and that is simply asking way too much of anyone. Your cause is an important one, but it isn't the only one and people have their own issues they want to deal with. That isn't selfish, it's reality.

I'm really pissed off that the government won't let me refinance my student loan at a lower interest rate and that as a result, I will pay an extra $200,000 over the life of the loan and maybe have it paid off in time to retire. I don't think that is fair when others are able to refinance.

But I don't expect you or Ed to turn my grievance into a cause you are totally devoted to and write about it everyday or call your Congressman. It is my burden, not yours. The best I can hope for is that people will offer their support but I have no right to demand it or feel cheated if they don't give it to me in the way I would like.

So I bring it back- if I were to write about your case in a post (which would also include my analysis of your present situation that you don't care for), then what?

DR. MARY JOHNSON said...

Sam, do what you like. Write what you like. But if you can't do something to help move things forward, I'd respectfully ask you to take a pass. I've spent quite a bit of keyboard time outlining how your legal analysis is not the only analysis . . . and how my case (like the Nifong/Duke case) could be moved along (in the criminal arena - rather than the civil one) by blogger & local press attention. In the Duke case, MANY bloggers ran running narratives (which be clear, I'm not asking you to do) - or at least dropped in on the story now and then as it developed/evolved. As a result, a situation that seemed legally impossible for those kids to navigate was resolved totally in their favor.

Three years after being invited into the GSO blogosphere by John Robinson - on the pretense that he/the paper had "teamed" with local bloggers to make great strides in local journalism - to cover stories that otherwise would not get newsprint - we've all discovered (yourself included) that it's just a lie . . . a damned lie as my Daddy would say if he were still alive. I've gotten nothing but radio silence from the local papers, and I believe it is because ten years ago, as a young doctor, I took on the name of Cone (which make no mistake, is behind everything Randolph Hospital does). Three years ago, I took on another Cone. And here we are.

I do, under those circumstances, think I have the "right" to feel cheated by our news outlets.

"Cone doesn't have that kind of power despite what he thinks." Indeed.

BTW, with all due sympathy, do you really think it's appropriate, after the hell I've been through - and blood I've spilt - in the student loan arena, to tell me how "pissed off" you are about the terms of paying off yours?

With a hattip to Joe, I linked to Doug Clark's analysis of state government in this post. Several statments he made induced a Mountain Dew sinus wash. First there was this gem: "Anyone paying attention should have seen trouble coming. The first ingredient of good government is honesty. North Carolina lately has experienced an outbreak of corruption."

There's NO sudden "outbreak", Sam. It's been there all along.

The "pay-to-play" culture Doug talks about has been the way business was done for years. And as much as it might the Cone-heads' collective heads spin, Rachel Hunter is right-on-the-money (key word money) about "the beast".

The newspapers don't pay any attention (because the corporate publishers are paying-to-play too) until the latest greedy/dishonest bastard is in jail, the money is gone or somebody is dead. Investigative journalism is all but dead.

Pay-to-play still the way it's done all over this state (I linked to a post here on how NC Medical Society does it). I'm seeing it now in Asheboro's annexation wars . . . the proannexation crew (again, led by my nemisis, the way-overpaid, Bob Morrison), despite all of its shady machinations, is getting pretty much a free pass by (and lots of favorable ink from) the Courier Tribune . . . while the anti-annexation forces are getting the cold shoulder the Renfros.

One has to file a lawsuit to get any press - and (as I've said) the first time I did that (nine years ago), I did not even get that because I did not the Renfro's economic agenda to shore up Randolph Hospital's business no-matter-what and at-all-costs. Neither David nor Bonnie seem to get that it might be time to improve the hospital's reputation by getting rid of the dishonest, two-faced jerks who have been running the hospital into the ground (and running off doctors) for fifteen years.

Doug's statement that "The News & Record and other media have noted problems for years." is just LAUGHABLE - and another lie. The News & Record barely notices anything unless it is soaked in race. This newspaper can beat thirty year-old-legally-dead horses to death . . . but they can't send a reporter down to Asheboro for a half-day to look at some documents that would prove my case.

If I were a black lady doctor, victimized by a bunch of white-mill-town-good-ole boys, I can gurantee you that I'd have been all over the N&R's front page years ago.

As I understand it, in a week you will be filing a lawsuit against the city of Greensboro in order to get public records you think we all have a right to see. And that's fine. I'm not sure I agree that it's worth it, but you don't see me up your butt in comment after comment tearing you/your position down just to prove I'm right and you're wrong. In fact, I've been supportive in all of my comments.

I went to Court and I asked for things (that, as it turned out were public record) and a judge ordered for them to be provided. Two "non-profit" executives (and their lawyers) circumvented the law by filing false answers under Oath - in order to seal a bad deal and keep me from coming back home. The law/statute, as written (linked here) is very clear as to what that is . . . and it is also very clear that there are supposed to be dire consequences.

I simply do not care that "it's never done" (which seems to be your argument against skipping down the yellow-brick-road of criminal investigation & prosecution). Perhaps, as We-The-Put-Upon-People suffer more consequences from these random "outbreaks of corruption", it should be.

Everybody seems to want me to just go away and file a lawsuit. I may shortly make their day - in an election year no less.

And if it goes down, it's not going to be what you expect either.

But the point kind of is, if we lived in a state that was not so damned corrupt, I would not need to do that. That's part and parcel of what I'm asking people to think about.

What it I were YOU? How would you feel? And would you not expect the law to work for you?

meblogin said...

I want you to do what you plan to do!

Go get the bad guys and make them pay big time!

Today...do it now!

I feel that you don't want Sam to offer advice. He stayed quiet for years...you get a little attention and now turn away...not sure that it makes sense. Sam is a good guy.

DR. MARY JOHNSON said...

MeB, I think my next post will prove that I have, in no way, "turned away" from Sam.

Stay tuned.